This debate is about the doctrine of subsequence which is the doctrine that teaches that baptism in the Spirit takes place subsequently to regeneration, either logically or temporally. Here's my BLOGPOST where I discuss my views on the topic. The debate below is between Todd Barham who holds to the doctrine of subsequence and Michael Miller who denies subsequence.
At 1:06:26 Joshua Lewis incorrectly states that Gordon Fee held to the doctrine of subsequence. Fee specifically denies it in his article: "Baptism in the Holy Spirit: The Issue of Separability And Subsequence" from "PNEUMA: The Journal of the Society for Pentecostal Studies" 7:2 (Fall, 1985), 87-99 [also linked HERE]
The Second Blessing Debate: Two views of Spirit Baptism
No comments:
Post a Comment